After the flurry of daily news about the contest between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama subsided, it seems a large percentage of the news bulletins is about remarks made about each candidate, their supporters, advisors, friends and enemies.
Quoting from George Orwell’s 1984 “We shall squeeze you empty, then fill you up with ourselves.”
Someone makes a derogatory remark about a candidate and the news, morning noon and nite, talks about it. Then the person who is the object of the remark responds and that is hashed out over and over on all the news stations. It dies down in a couple of days, then someone else makes some remark about the other candidate, and that’s repetitious news for a day until he responds and the spin begins about his response. Over and over in the past several weeks it’s the same thing—derogatory remarks about first one candidate, then the other, and their cutesy retorts and repetition.
It’s a race in a game play to see who can get the most news coverage about creative news seeking. The presidential race seems reduced to see which can get the most notice over remarks about him and his response to those remarks. As I’ve tried to keep score, I think Obama is ahead because he seems to have ticked off so many preachers. Like a bunch of teenagers fighting back and forth, they attempt to make news by “distancing” themselves from the remarks made about them and to them. Until the next day when more crop up and the beat goes on.
I’m beginning to suspect it’s all pre-planned for headline grabbing. The old saying, “there’s only one thing worse than being talked about and that’s not being talked about” seems to be the underlying notion behind all this useless, boring news seeking, which is tantamount to back fence gossip.
With an expensive war going on, the dollar being devalued, people losing their jobs and homes, struggling to pay for gas in their cars, aliens crossing the borders, fires burning out of control, severe weather destroying thousands of lives, homes, crops, property, and food prices soaring, the two candidates running for the highest office in this land spend more time bickering back and forth about who’s saying what about whom.
If it were not for the seriousness of the matter it would be downright ludicrous. They are diddling and fiddling while Rome burns.
Follow me
twitter / annecleveland-
RSS Links
Blogroll
Archives
- January 2012 (10)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (14)
- October 2011 (30)
- September 2011 (19)
- August 2011 (20)
- July 2011 (20)
- June 2011 (10)
- May 2011 (20)
- April 2011 (14)
- March 2011 (6)
- February 2011 (17)
- January 2011 (16)
- December 2010 (19)
- November 2010 (10)
- October 2010 (26)
- September 2010 (20)
- August 2010 (17)
- July 2010 (11)
- June 2010 (6)
- May 2010 (11)
- April 2010 (14)
- March 2010 (11)
- February 2010 (12)
- January 2010 (15)
- December 2009 (13)
- November 2009 (17)
- October 2009 (22)
- September 2009 (23)
- August 2009 (10)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (7)
- May 2009 (15)
- April 2009 (15)
- March 2009 (18)
- February 2009 (16)
- January 2009 (13)
- December 2008 (11)
- November 2008 (20)
- October 2008 (19)
- September 2008 (26)
- August 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (7)
- June 2008 (5)
- May 2008 (8)
- April 2008 (13)
- March 2008 (11)
- February 2008 (12)
- January 2008 (11)